On a busy workday, a small hot spot can waste a lot of time. A thermal camera can make that hunt much easier. FLIR TG267 Vs C5 shows two useful but different options. One feels more like a field tool. The other feels more like a pocket camera.
FLIR TG267 Review
The FLIR TG267 is made for fault checks in daily field work. It has a 160 × 120 thermal sensor, a 2.4-inch screen, and a Class 1 laser. It also uses MSX to add visual detail to thermal images.
The model is now discontinued. So, availability may vary, and used or remaining stock may be the main option.
Pros and Cons
The main strengths are clear. A few limits also matter before choosing this older model.
| Type | Feature | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Pro | 160 × 120 IR | Gives a clear heat view |
| Pro | Class 1 laser | Helps point at the target |
| Pro | MSX mode | Adds visual detail |
| Pro | 5-hour battery | Helps with long checks |
| Con | Discontinued | New stock may be harder to find |
| Con | 394 g body | Less pocket-friendly |
Field Use
The TG267 suits work where a laser can save time. It can scan electrical parts, HVAC parts, motors, and other warm surfaces.
The 2.4-inch screen is easy to view. The MSX mode can also make a hot spot easier to link to a real part. The body is larger than the C5, but that can feel fine in a tool bag.
Recommendation
This model makes sense when the right used or remaining stock is available. The laser and longer battery life can still be useful.
| User Type | Recommendation | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Electricians | Good Fit | Laser helps target hot parts |
| HVAC users | Good Fit | Wide temperature range |
| Field techs | Good Fit | Rugged 2 m drop design |
| Pocket users | Not Ideal | Body is larger |
| New-product buyers | Not Ideal | Model is discontinued |
FLIR C5 Review
The FLIR C5 takes a smaller approach. Its pocket body is easy to carry from one task to the next. It also adds a 5 MP visual camera, touch control, Wi-Fi, and cloud storage.
Its thermal range runs from -20°C to 400°C. That gives the C5 a slightly higher top range than the TG267.
Pros and Cons
The small body is the big draw. The camera also adds useful tools for saving and sharing images.
| Type | Feature | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Pro | 160 × 120 IR | Shows useful heat detail |
| Pro | 5 MP camera | Gives better visual context |
| Pro | Touch screen | Makes control simple |
| Pro | Wi-Fi and cloud | Helps share images |
| Pro | 4-hour battery | Good for daily checks |
| Con | No laser | Aiming needs more care |
Pocket Use
The C5 is easy to carry. Its 138 × 84 × 24 mm body is much smaller than the TG267. That can be a big win when tools already fill the bag.
The touch screen also keeps daily checks simple. The 5 MP visual camera helps show what sits around a hot spot. The lack of a laser can be a small pain when exact aiming matters.
Recommendation
The C5 fits users who value size, touch control, and easy image sharing.
| User Type | Recommendation | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile techs | Good Fit | Pocket-size body |
| Inspectors | Good Fit | Easy image storage |
| Report-focused users | Good Fit | Cloud and Wi-Fi tools |
| Laser users | Not Ideal | No built-in laser |
| Long field shifts | Not Ideal | Shorter listed battery life |
Detailed Comparison for FLIR TG267 Vs C5
Both cameras use a 160 × 120 thermal sensor. The real differences sit in the body, camera, laser, temperature range, and data tools.
Performance: FLIR TG267 Vs C5
The core thermal resolution is the same. Both models use 160 × 120 pixels and list thermal sensitivity below 70 mK.
The C5 reaches 400°C. The TG267 reaches 380°C. Both also use an 8.7 Hz image rate, so neither is built for fast-moving heat scenes.
| Feature | FLIR TG267 | FLIR C5 |
|---|---|---|
| IR resolution | 160 × 120 | 160 × 120 |
| Thermal sensitivity | <70 mK | <70 mK |
| Max temperature | 380°C | 400°C |
| Image rate | 8.7 Hz | 8.7 Hz |
| Focus | Focus free | Focus free |
FLIR TG267 Rating: 9/10
FLIR C5 Rating: 9/10
Ease of Use: FLIR TG267 Vs C5
The TG267 uses a tool-style design with a button-activated Class 1 laser. That helps when a target needs quick pointing.
The C5 uses a capacitive touch screen. It also has 1-Touch Level/Span control. That makes the C5 feel closer to a small smart device.
| Feature | FLIR TG267 | FLIR C5 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | 2.4-inch color LCD | Capacitive touch |
| Laser | Yes | No |
| Focus | Focus free | Focus free |
| Control style | Button based | Touch based |
FLIR TG267 Rating: 9/10
FLIR C5 Rating: 9/10
Build Quality: FLIR TG267 Vs C5
Both cameras are built for field use. Both have IP54 protection and a 2-meter drop rating. So, neither model should be called clearly tougher based on these ratings alone.
The size is the big difference. The TG267 is larger and weighs 394 g. The C5 has a much smaller pocket form.
| Feature | FLIR TG267 | FLIR C5 |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 210 × 64 × 81 mm | 138 × 84 × 24 mm |
| Weight | 394 g | Pocket form |
| Drop rating | 2 m | 2 m |
| Protection | IP54 | IP54 |
FLIR TG267 Rating: 9/10
FLIR C5 Rating: 9/10
Maintenance: FLIR TG267 Vs C5
Both models use built-in rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. The TG267 lists up to 5 hours of continuous scanning. The C5 lists up to 4 hours.
The C5 charges by USB-C in about 2 hours. The TG267 lists 4 hours to reach 90% and 6 hours for a full charge.
| Feature | FLIR TG267 | FLIR C5 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion |
| Listed run time | 5 hours | 4 hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Storage | 4 GB | >5,000 images |
FLIR TG267 Rating: 8/10
FLIR C5 Rating: 9/10
Value for Money: FLIR TG267 Vs C5
Value is harder to judge because the TG267 is discontinued. A remaining unit may still make sense if the laser and longer battery life matter.
The C5 has the advantage for current use. It adds a 5 MP camera, Wi-Fi, cloud storage, and a pocket body.
| Feature | FLIR TG267 | FLIR C5 |
|---|---|---|
| Main strength | Field fault checks | Pocket inspection |
| Visual camera | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Cloud and Wi-Fi | No cloud | Yes |
| Laser | Yes | No |
| Status | Discontinued | Current product |
FLIR TG267 Rating: 7/10
FLIR C5 Rating: 9/10
Conclusion
The FLIR TG267 still has useful strengths, especially its laser and longer listed battery life. However, it is discontinued.
The FLIR C5 is the better fit for a compact tool, touch control, image sharing, and current use.
FAQs
Is FLIR TG267 better than C5?
Not for every user. The TG267 has a laser and longer listed battery life. The C5 is smaller and adds Wi-Fi, cloud storage, and a 5 MP visual camera.
Does FLIR TG267 have better thermal resolution?
No. Both models use a 160 × 120 thermal sensor. Both also list thermal sensitivity below 70 mK.
Which has the higher temperature range?
The C5 has the higher top range at 400°C. The TG267 reaches 380°C.
Does FLIR TG267 have a laser?
Yes. The TG267 has a button-activated Class 1 laser. The C5 does not list a laser.
Is FLIR TG267 still available?
The TG267 is listed as discontinued on the official product page. Remaining stock or used units may still appear.